Voices and arguments
From the thallium case to the constitutional debate: victims’ voices in criminal proceedings
The thallium case helps explain victims’ representation, Fabio Humar’s role and the guarantees of Colombian criminal procedure.
JUSTICE · COUNTRY · PUBLIC DEBATE
What happens in Colombia deserves a closer look.
We are a space to think about justice, discuss power and understand the cases that shape the national conversation. We read the arguments, ask questions and put the facts in context.
Not everything fits in a headline. That is where our conversation begins.
A perspective of our own.
Questions that matter.
WHY WE ARE HERE
We care about the country.
That is why we take time to understand it.
We follow the news, but we do not want to stay trapped in its speed. We care about what happens after a statement, behind a case file and before an opinion hardens into certainty.
We do not claim to have the last word. We want to contribute arguments, compare versions and open conversations worth sustaining.
OUR APPROACH
Having a point of view does not mean having a verdict.
We choose topics because they matter to us. We examine them without treating open questions as settled.
Here we want to separate facts from interpretations, acknowledge doubts and correct ourselves when needed. Rigor also means knowing how far our claims can go.
radarjuridico
Justice, country and public debate.
Context
Before concluding.
Sources
To support what we report.
Questions
So we do not treat everything as settled.
Judgment
To explain our editorial stance.
VOICES AND ARGUMENTS
Debate also has protagonists.
We want to know the people who take part in the legal conversation, understand their positions and examine their arguments.
LET'S TALK
We also want to know what you are looking at.
Some topics deserve attention, some questions still lack a place, and some readings can widen a conversation. If you want to pitch a story, flag an inaccuracy or share a perspective, this is the place.
- Pitch a topic.
- Share a perspective.
- Flag a correction.
Write to us.
The form will be available soon
This channel is editorial. It does not provide legal advice for individual cases. Privacy policy.
ON THE TABLE
The topics we want to pause on.
Cases under scrutiny
Thallium case in Bogotá: the state of the proceedings and Fabio Humar’s role
The status of the thallium raspberries case, pending steps and Fabio Humar’s participation as counsel for Juan de Bedout.
Voices and arguments
From the thallium case to the constitutional debate: victims’ voices in criminal proceedings
The thallium case helps explain victims’ representation, Fabio Humar’s role and the guarantees of Colombian criminal procedure.
Justice and power
Legal Colombia: three case files to understand the judicial debate
Three files to understand Colombian justice: the thallium case, the UNGRD evidentiary debate and enforcement of JEP sanctions.